The ACP Advocate Blog

by Bob Doherty

Friday, May 1, 2009

Time to get real on primary care

As I've written in many blog posts, policymakers seem all to be in agreement that primary care is essential to a high performing health care system. Capitol Hill is alive with the sounds of lawmakers promising to enact major reforms to increase the numbers of primary care physicians, a goal that is expressly mentioned in the budget resolution passed yesterday by Congress.

The problem, though, is so far the modest policies being considered don't seem to be equal to the stakes involved. In a new policy paper, ACP lays out in stark terms why primary care medicine is in crisis, and what needs to be done now to reverse it. The now must include substantial changes in Medicare payment policies to make primary care a viable career path compared to other specialties.

My concern is that the legislative process could result in minimalist policies that throw a few dollars primary care's way, but not enough to make a difference. Politicians might then think they've done something to solve the problem, while meanwhile, young physicians will continue to vote with their feet and pursue other specialty fields. Deeply disheartened established primary care physicians will wonder why the political system has once again left them behind. And patients will wonder why they can't find a primary care doctor.

Politicians need to hear from voters that saving primary care demands a wholesale revamping of federal policies, including paying primary care doctors what they are worth. Happy talk about primary care is well and good, but happy talk won't get more doctors to go into primary care or keep struggling primary care practices from closing their doors.

Today's question: Do you think politicians understand what is really needed to save primary care? If not, how do we get them to understand?

5 Comments :

Blogger Jay Larson MD said...

Politicians do not know how to save primary care. The primary care crisis may have to reach epic levels (which is not too long in the distant future) to get the fix it needs.

"America will always do the right thing, but only after exhausting all other options."
Winston Churchill

May 1, 2009 at 2:50 PM  
Blogger jonas said...

A few of them get it, but most do not. Without spending an extended period of time (years) in a direct healthcare setting, it is almost impossible to do so. One cannot lead the fight on poverty without spending time in poor neighborhoods, likewise one cannot reform healthcare without spending time there.

Many politicians don't understand it though most say they do -- really some pretend they do, some think they do. But their impressions are limited, and their opinions often fed to them. They have been taken in by special interests (some believing in earnest what they hear, some less so).

Imagine if doctors tried to reform the legal world!

May 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM  
Blogger Rich Neubauer MD said...

In the title of the Senate Finance Committee Options paper is the word "Transform". There is one single metric that politicians can and should use to determine if their efforts at transformation are working: how many newly trained physicians are choosing and continuing in primary care careers. Right now it is a vanishingly small number. Our government, through their policies including CMS payment policies, has clearly been failing at this for some time and their current proposals listed in the Senate options paper pretty clearly will not work. ACP needs to continue to press for measures that will actually work. The Senate Finance committee should lead the way by not passing off continued incrementalism as transformation.

May 2, 2009 at 6:14 PM  
Blogger DrJHO7 said...

At our local medical society it is said,"you won't see legislative reform in health care until there's blood in the streets."
That mantra applied to tort reform at the time, but it could apply to the primary care medicine (PCM) work force issue as well.
When patients are saying "I can't find a primary physician" in loud enough voices and in large enough numbers, the situation will get more attention, but then it may take 4-7 years for effective legislative interventions to stem the tide.
ACP's solutions paper is excellent - it's thoroughly researched, well referenced, very specific with regard to recommendations about payment reform that would be likely to have an impact on PCM in the forseeable future. It seems the only thing that needs to worked out is - well, where to get (take)the funding. I wonder if this and other papers actually get read in WDC?

May 4, 2009 at 6:55 PM  
Blogger gmcl48 said...

hI - just a few comments, thanks for the opportunity to do so. The problem ariculated is really a patient centered problem, not an ACP problem - that is "how do patients get their health care" is the question. The first recommendation of the comprehensive report from the ACP is for the Federal Govt to establish a commission to look into this. In general this sounds good, but will likely mean no action, or action over the next few years. It is very likely that universal health care reform will be developed very quickly based upon what has clarity - right now what has clarity are economic models, not the patient centered medical model. So the ACP in my view needs to articulate a practical vision to compete and complement the economic models of health care - and the report as written is good. ( and not get lost in some national committee). Since different groups in the medical model might want different things to satisfy their groups, the medical system is seen as fractured, and has no universal vision that articulates clearly fundamental principles of health care. To me the appearances are that the medical profession really has not had much of a role in the health care debate, and likely will remain irrelavant apart from a little window dressing. So i would think that major changes in approach, form and function are required for the medical profession to come out as a winner in the continuing major shifts in health care. I would be happy to be wrong. However, need to "get real" about being relevant to the health care changes at all.

May 6, 2009 at 3:28 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

About the Author

Bob Doherty is Senior Vice President, American College of Physicians Government Affairs and Public Policy; Author of the ACP Advocate Blog

Email Bob Doherty: TheACPAdvocateblog@acponline.org.

Share/Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

The ACP Advocate Blog

Recognition

The 2009 Medical Blog Awards
Voted Best Health Policy/Ethics Blog 2009

Healthcare Bloggers
10 Healthcare Bloggers We're Thankful For

Blog log

Health Blog
The Wall Street Journal's blog on health and the business of health.

Health Affairs Magazine Blog
The Policy Journal of the Health Sphere.

The Health Care Blog
Everything you always wanted to know about the Health Care system. But were afraid to ask.

MD Whistleblower
Vignettes and commentaries on the medical profession.

The New Health Dialogue Blog
From the New America Foundation.

Kevin MD
Medical Weblog

DB's Medical Rants
Contemplating medicine and the health care system

EGMN Notes From The Road
Bloggers post from medical meetings, press conferences, and policy gatherings from the U.S. and around the world, providing readers with a tasty analysis of the buzz, the people, and the stories that don't get told.

FutureDocs Blog
A blog dedicated to medical education, news, and policy as well as career advising.

Disease Management Care Blog
An ongoing resource for information, insights, peer-review literature and musings from the world of disease management, the medical home, the chronic care model, the patient centered medical home, informatics, pay for performance, primary care, chronic illness and health insurance.

Medical Professionalism Blog
The Medical Professionalism Blog was created by the ABIM Foundation to stimulate conversation and highlight best practices related to professionalism in medicine.

Powered by Blogger

Comment policy & copyright info